Either I've

This is the output recevied
--------log-------
patching file apps/tuxbox/neutrino/src/gui/channellist.cpp
Hunk #1 succeeded at 931 with fuzz 1 (offset 195 lines).
patching file apps/tuxbox/neutrino/src/gui/channellist.h
Hunk #1 FAILED at 116.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file apps/tuxbox/neutrino/src/gui/channellist.h.rej
patching file apps/tuxbox/neutrino/src/gui/infoviewer.cpp
Hunk #1 FAILED at 315.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 438 with fuzz 2 (offset 13 lines).
Hunk #3 FAILED at 458.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 841 with fuzz 2 (offset 382 lines).
2 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file apps/tuxbox/neutrino/src/gui/infoviewer.cpp.rej
--------end log--------
now I do have the .rejects files if it helps but my (half a) brain is telling me something's changed since yesterday (was working fine 'til then) ? so I did a bit more digging and discovered the changes in CVS since yesterday which are blocking the sucessful execution of the patch. Namely:
channellist.h now has this (new since yesterday) line added:
"void virtual_zap_mode(bool up);"
(does this now replace what the patch would have

"void sky_mode(bool up);" ??)
If so this would mean "sky-mode" is now in CVS ? hmmmm, that would be nice:-)
and infoviewer now has this line:
"bool virtual_zap_mode = false;"
which is probably where the patch line of:
"bool sky_mode = false;"
would have gone....
So I could probably fix the patch myself but the question now becomes, do I need to ? Are the changes that have prevented the patch from running the very changes that the patch would have



Cheers.